My parents and my brother live in Florida. Thanks to the electoral college and the breakdown of red and blue states – their votes will count for much more than mine here in blue, blue Chicago. And so far, they’re voting for Bush.
A couple of days ago I decided to open a dialog with my folks about the debates, hoping to find a way to turn them – or at least, give them some things to consider before pulling the trigger. I did so against my better judgement: we typically disagree, and they are stubborn (like me). Worse, I tend to take it personally when we disagree; they’re my parents, and deep down I suppose I’ll always be their child, looking for approval.
But I did it. I sent my dad a forward about the debates, and asked to hear his thoughts.
—
The response was not encouraging. In a nutshell, he is anti “liberal”, and views Kerry as a “redistributionist” who thinks too much. According to my father:
being President is NOT like being in a debate…it is more like being in the boxing ring, getting punched repeatedly vs. being one of the clever sideline commentators.
Ok – sure. Being President is about trying to make decisions under pressure. But is Bush the kind of person to have making those decisions? My dad saw a PBS special about the candidates, and felt that:
…it indicated that Bush is the type who asks advisors what they think, makes up his own mind and then is hard-headed about implementing the decision… Kerry is much smoother and more analytical. One of Kerry’s own advisors said “When we’d talk about an issue, I could imagine maybe 4 or 5 approaches to argue. John would see 25 options and would want to discuss each one of them in detail.” When the President is being bombarded with problems (like the boxer in the ring) I have a concern about “paralysis by analysis”. Jimmy Carter was a very smart President, but he didn’t get much accomplished and was seen as undecisive.
So a tough, hard-headed guy who is quick to make decisions and act – as opposed to a thoughtful, analytical person who tries to see all the angles and make an informed decision? This is the ideal for a man who starts every project by sharpening (not one, but two) pencils and making a detailed diagram (on graph paper)? This from the engineer who supervised a nuclear power plant, who consults on “Total Quality Management” – a die-hard for “Doing It Right The First Time”?
—
Later in the day, my brother (who was CC’d on the thread) sent out this smug joke about voting Republican. I’d been holding back all day, processing my feelings about my father’s email, weighing various approaches and takes on the content he presented. But the ant/grashopper thing just pushed me overboard, and I responded with somewhat of a rant. It’s probably weak, as arguments go (even with edits). But I was tired and hungry, and… disappointed in both of them.
The thing is – I realize that these candidates are basically sides of an all-too-familar coin. I get that to become a politician in this country you need to have great fortune, or a fortune – and that the latter is more often the case. In the last 30 years, the two parties have drifted closer together, appealing to “extremes” in election times. I understand that most of the promises on both sides are necessarily empty. But even still, I feel there’s an imporant philosophical difference between them.
—
This morning I was playing some Kingdom of Loathing while eating my breakfast. I hadn’t played in a couple of days, and my adventures were piling up – and really, I just wanted to take a break from reading and thinking. I’d been trudging along at level 4, visiting the limerick dungeon, acquiring moxie and muscle – and the occsaional mysticalness. After a somewhat damaging visit to Degrassi Knoll, I decided to take a rest and … check my messages.
In my inbox was a prompt to donate to the KOL fund via PayPal, in exchange for a “Mr. Accessory”. The sender promised 300 million meat in return for a message – sounded like a bunch of hooy to me. But I have been enjoying the game, so I donated anyway. Never hurts, right?
Mr. Accessory arrived. I equipped him. HOLY CRAP!
Suddenly the mail made sense. The “Mr. Store” (where you can get much stronger Accessories in exchange for say – $50 worth of Mr. Accessories) made sense. Guys of level 215 with every manner of meat made sense. Jesus Christ, what a bummer.
It’s not that I don’t expect this kind of stuff to go on – it always goes on. In any economy, such things go on. It’s just that … well, with a silly little game like KOL – shouldn’t the players kind of *not care* about all that crap? Shouldn’t they be like me – just playing it because the jokes are funny, and it’s fun to puzzle over your 40-odd moves a day? Play nice, enjoy, all happy happy joy joy style?
Fat chance, you hippy!
—
And that’s just the thing, isn’t it?
The Republicans are about keeping Mr. Accessory in the dark. Let the “in crowd” pass it around, let the proles work up from the bottom. In the minds of Republicans, the Mr. Accessories of this world are a secret – best kept by a select few. Those newbs would only mess everything up for the rest of us, anyhow.
Democrats, on the other hand, are about exposing Accessories for what they are: a quick trip up the ladder, in exchange for a little… compromise. Sure – it’s gonna happen. In fact – it’s probably a good thing, because it helps people get where they want to go (if they want it badly enough). But it’s something we should acknowledge. Each person should have the chance to aim for a Mr. Accessory, and the means to obtain him.
After that – well, it’s up to you.
—
So now you know. My relatives may put that asshole in the White House for another 4 years, and on top of that, I’m traipsing around with store-bought muscles. If you want to level up really fast, go donate some cashola. Then, if’n ya want, go find a clan where you can exchange your Mr. Accessory for a crapload of meat.
… so you can go to the Mall of Loathing, buy a bunch of grapefruit schnapps, and party like a grasshopper, baby.